Is Our Salary Benchmarking Out of Date for 2026

Compensation conversations in financial services rarely stay static for long. Markets shift, regulation evolves, and demand for specific skill sets rises and falls. For leadership teams planning hiring in 2026, the question of whether salary benchmarking remains accurate is becoming increasingly relevant.
Outdated compensation data can influence hiring decisions in subtle ways. Firms may assume that a budget reflects the market when it no longer does. Search processes then begin with expectations that candidates quietly decline. The conclusion reached internally is often that talent has become unrealistic. In reality the benchmark may simply be several years behind.
Certain roles have seen particular movement. Heads of compliance, operational leaders, and experienced distribution professionals have experienced stronger demand as regulation tightens and growth strategies become more sophisticated. In wealth management and asset management firms, these functions now sit closer to the centre of commercial decision making.
Salary benchmarking also needs to reflect broader changes in career motivation. Senior professionals often look beyond base pay to assess stability, governance, and long term opportunity. Compensation still matters, though its structure has evolved. Deferred bonuses, equity participation, and flexible working expectations all influence the overall proposition.
Another complication arises when internal pay structures have remained static while the external market has shifted. Long serving employees may find themselves compensated differently from incoming hires performing similar roles. Addressing this imbalance requires careful communication, particularly where loyalty has been rewarded historically.
Boards sometimes underestimate the signalling effect of compensation. A package that appears out of step with the market can imply that the firm has not fully considered the level of leadership it is seeking. Conversely, well benchmarked offers reinforce credibility with candidates from the outset.
Reviewing salary benchmarks periodically helps avoid these tensions. Firms that approach compensation openly with credible data tend to run smoother hiring processes and retain talent more effectively.
At Fram Search we support financial services firms in understanding how the market for senior talent is evolving. Compensation is only one element of a hiring decision, though it often shapes the first impression candidates form about a role.
About Fram Search
Established in 2010, Fram Search is a specialist financial services recruitment consultancy. We support firms across wealth management, asset management, venture capital, private markets and wider financial services, helping clients secure exceptional talent from specialist professionals through to senior leadership teams.
Our consultants combine deep sector expertise with extensive candidate networks developed across financial planning, investment management, venture capital, EIS & VCT, private markets, asset finance, fintech and corporate functions. We provide both contingent recruitment and executive search services, helping clients attract, assess and retain the talent required to drive growth and long-term success.
Please contact us on 01525 864 372 / [email protected] to learn more.
Share this Post
